Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
1.
Int. arch. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.) ; 22(4): 408-414, Oct.-Dec. 2018. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-975611

ABSTRACT

Abstract Introduction The P3 cognitive evoked potential is recorded when a subject correctly identifies, evaluates and processes two different auditory stimuli. Objective to evaluate the latency and amplitude of the P3 evoked potential in 26 cochlear implant users with post-lingual deafness with good or poor speech recognition scores as compared with normal hearing subjects matched for age and educational level. Methods In this prospective cohort study, auditory cortical responses were recorded from 26 post-lingual deaf adult cochlear implant users (19 with good and 7 with poor speech recognition scores) and 26 control subjects. Results There was a significant difference in the P3 latency between cochlear implant users with poor speech recognition scores (G-) and their control group (CG) (p= 0.04), and between G- and cochlear implant users with good speech discrimination (G+) (p= 0.01). We found no significant difference in the P3 latency between the CG and G+. In this study, all G- patients had deafness due to meningitis, which suggests that higher auditory function was impaired too. Conclusion Post-lingual deaf adult cochlear implant users in the G- group had prolonged P3 latencies as compared with the CG and the cochlear implant users in the G+ group. The amplitudes were similar between patients and controls. All G- subjects were deaf due to meningitis. These findings suggest that meningitis may have deleterious effects not only on the peripheral auditory system but on the central auditory processing as well.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Cochlear Implants , Event-Related Potentials, P300/physiology , Deafness/physiopathology , Speech Perception/physiology , Prospective Studies , Meningitis/complications
2.
Braz. j. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.) ; 83(1): 16-22, Jan.-Feb. 2017. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-839411

ABSTRACT

Abstract Objective This study aimed to evaluate if hearing performance is a predictor of postural control in cochlear implant (CI) users at least six months after surgery. Methods Cross-sectional study including (CI) recipients with post-lingual deafness and controls who were divided into the following groups: nine CI users with good hearing performance (G+), five CI users with poor hearing performance (G−), and seven controls (CG). For each patient, computerized dynamic posturography (CDP) tests, a sensory organization test (SOT), and an adaptation test (ADT) were applied as dual task performance, with first test (FT) and re-test (RT) on the same day, including a 40–60 min interval between them to evaluate the short-term learning ability on postural recovery strategies. The results of the groups were compared. Results Comparing the dual task performance on CDP and the weighted average between all test conditions, the G+ group showed better performance on RT in SOT4, SOT5, SOT6, and CS, which was not observed for G− and CG. The G− group had significantly lower levels of short-term learning ability than the other two groups in SOT5 (p = 0.021), SOT6 (p = 0.025), and CS (p = 0.031). Conclusion The CI users with good hearing performance had a higher index of postural recovery when compared to CI users with poor hearing performance.


Resumo Objetivo O presente estudo teve por objetivo avaliar se o desempenho auditivo é preditor de controle postural em usuários de IC pelo menos seis meses após a cirurgia. Método Estudo transversal que consistiu em recipientes de implante coclear (IC) com surdez pós-lingual e controles, que foram divididos nos seguintes grupos: nove usuários de IC com bom desempenho auditivo (G+), cinco usuários de usuários de IC com desempenho auditivo insatisfatório (G-) e sete controles (GC). Aplicamos os testes de posturografia dinâmica computadorizada (PDC), de organização sensitiva (TOS) e de adaptação (TAd) como desempenho de dupla tarefa, primeiro teste (PT) e reteste (RT) no mesmo dia, com intervalo de 40-60 minutos entre testes, com o objetivo de avaliar a capacidade de aprendizado em curto prazo nas estratégias de recuperação postural. Comparamos os resultados dos testes. Resultados Na comparação do desempenho de dupla tarefa no teste PDC e a média ponderal entre todas as condições de teste, o grupo G+ demonstrou melhor desempenho no RT nos TOS4, TOS5, TOS6 e EC, o que não foi observado para os grupos G- e GC. O grupo G- obteve níveis significantemente mais baixos de capacidade de aprendizado em curto prazo vs. outros dois grupos no TOS5 (p = 0,021), TOS6 (p = 0,025) e EC (p = 0,031). Conclusão Usuários de IC com bom desempenho auditivo tiveram índice melhor de recuperação postural, quando comparados com usuários de IC com desempenho auditivo insatisfatório.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Posture/physiology , Cochlear Implants , Deafness/rehabilitation , Postural Balance/physiology , Speech Perception/physiology , Case-Control Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Deafness/physiopathology , Dizziness/physiopathology , Dizziness/rehabilitation , Hearing Tests
3.
Braz. j. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.) ; 81(6): 616-621, Nov.-Dec. 2015. tab, graf
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-770200

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION: Some patients with severe impairment of body balance do not obtain adequate improvement from vestibular rehabilitation (VR). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of Vertiguard(tm) biofeedback equipment as a sensory substitution (SS) of the vestibular system in patients who did not obtain sufficient improvement from VR. METHODS: This was a randomized prospective clinical study. Thirteen patients without satisfactory response to conventional VR were randomized into a study group (SG), which received the vibrotactile stimulus from Vertiguard(tm) for ten days, and a control group (CG), which used equipment without the stimulus. For pre- and post-treatment assessment, the Sensory Organization Test (SOT) protocol of the Computerized Dynamic Posturography (CDP) and two scales of balance self-perception, Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) and Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), were used. RESULTS: After treatment, only the SG showed statistically significant improvement in C5 (p = 0.007) and C6 (p = 0.01). On the ABC scale, there was a significant difference in the SG (p= 0.04). The DHI showed a significant difference in CG and SG with regard to the physical aspect, and only in the SG for the functional aspect (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The present findings show that sensory substitution using the vibrotactile stimulus of the Vertiguard(tm) system helped with the integration of neural networks involved in maintaining posture, improving the strategies used in the recovery of body balance.


RESUMO INTRODUÇÃO: Alguns pacientes com déficit severo do equilíbrio corporal submetidos à reabilitação vestibular (RV) podem não apresentar resultados satisfatórios. OBJETIVO: Verificar a eficácia do equipamento de biofeedback Vertiguard(tm) como substituto sensorial do sistema vestibular em pacientes sem bons resultados à RV. MÉTODO: Estudo prospectivo clínico randomizado. Treze pacientes sem resposta satisfatória à RV convencional foram randomizados entre grupo de estudo (GE), que utilizou o estímulo vibratório do Vertiguard(tm) por dez dias e grupo controle (GC) que usou o equipamento desligado. Para avaliação pré e pós-tratamento foi utilizado o protocolo Teste de Integração Sensorial (TIS) da Posturografia Dinâmica Computadorizada (PDC) e duas escalas de autopercepção do equilíbrio: ABC (Activities-specific Balance Confidence) e DHI (Dizziness Handicap Inventory). RESULTADOS: Apenas o GE apresentou melhora estatisticamente significante em C5 (p = 0,007) e C6 (p = 0,01) da PDC após treinamento. Na escala ABC houve diferença significante no GE (p = 0,04). No DHI ocorreu diferença significante no aspecto físico em ambos os grupos e no aspecto funcional (p= 0,04) apenas no GE. CONCLUSÃO: O estímulo de substituição sensorial do Vertiguard(tm) auxiliou a integração das redes neurais e na manutenção da postura, melhorando as estratégias utilizadas na recuperação do equilíbrio corporal.


Subject(s)
Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Biofeedback, Psychology/instrumentation , Vestibular Diseases/rehabilitation , Vestibular Function Tests/instrumentation , Postural Balance , Treatment Outcome , Vestibular Diseases/etiology , Vestibular Diseases/physiopathology
7.
São Paulo; s.n; 2011. 58 p. ilus, tab.
Thesis in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-620097

ABSTRACT

OBJETIVO: verificar a inter-relação entre a recuperação postural e o bom ou baixo desempenho de indivíduos usuários de implante coclear (IC). MÉTODO: Foram avaliados 21 indivíduos divididos em três grupos: nove usuários de IC com bom desempenho, cinco de IC com baixo desempenho e sete controles. Todos os sujeitos foram submetidos a dois testes: Teste de Integração Sensorial (TIS) da Posturografia Dinâmica Computadorizada (PDC), com intervalo de 40 a 60 minutos entre eles, com a finalidade de observar o aprendizado de estratégias posturais no segundo teste. Os resultados obtidos foram submetidos à avaliação estatística. RESULTADOS: Os indivíduos com baixo desempenho apresentaram níveis significativamente mais baixos de aprendizado que os outros dois Grupos em C4, C5, C6 e IE. CONCLUSÂO: Os usuários de IC com bom desempenho mostraram melhor índice de recuperação postural quando comparados àqueles de IC com baixo desempenho.


OBJECTIVE: To test the inter-relationship between postural recovery and good or poor performance of individuals using cochlear implant (CI). METHODS: We studied 21 subjects divided into three groups: nine cochlear implant users with good performance, 5 CI users with poor performance and 7 controls. All subjects underwent two tests in Sensory Integration Test (SOT) of computerized dynamic posturography (CDP) with an interval of 40 to 60 minutes between them, in order to observe the learning of postural strategies in the second test. The results were submitted to statistical evaluation. RESULTS: Individuals with poor performance had significantly lower difference between the results of the second and the first test than the other two groups at C4, C5, C6 and composite. CONCLUSION: CI users with good performance had better postural recovery rate when compared to the cochlear implant users with poor performance.


Subject(s)
Humans , Adult , Audiometry, Speech , Cochlear Implantation , Hearing Loss , Posture/physiology
8.
Clinics ; 66(12): 2043-2048, 2011. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-609000

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Impairments in balance can be a consequence of changes in the motor, sensory, and integrative aspects of motor control. Abnormal sensory reweighting, i.e., the ability to select the most appropriate sensory information to achieve postural stability, may contribute to balance impairment. The Sensory Organization Test is a component of Computerized Dynamic Posturography that evaluates the impact of visual, vestibular, and somatosensory inputs, as well as sensory reweighting, under conditions of sensory conflict. The aim of this study is to compare balance control in hemiparetic patients during the first year post-stroke and in age-matched neurologically normal subjects using the Berg Balance Scale and Computerized Dynamic Posturography. METHODS: We compared the Berg Balance Scale and Sensory Organization Test scores in 21 patients with hemiparesis after first-ever ischemic stroke and in 21 age-matched, neurologically normal subjects. An equilibrium score was defined for each Sensory Organization Test condition. RESULTS: Berg Balance Scale scores were significantly lower in the patients than in the neurologically normal subjects. Equilibrium scores were significantly lower in the patients than in the neurologically normal subjects for those Sensory Organization Test conditions that did not provide appropriate somatosensory information and under conditions of sensory conflict. A history of falls was more frequent in patients with lower equilibrium scores. CONCLUSION: During the first year after a stroke, defective sensory reweighting significantly impacts balance control in hemiparetic patients. These results are important for the planning of effective rehabilitation interventions.


Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Paresis/physiopathology , Postural Balance/physiology , Sensation Disorders/physiopathology , Stroke/physiopathology , Vestibule, Labyrinth/physiopathology , Paresis/etiology , Severity of Illness Index , Sensation Disorders/etiology , Stroke/complications , Time Factors
10.
Arq. int. otorrinolaringol. (Impr.) ; 11(4): 406-410, out.-dez. 2007. graf
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-494042

ABSTRACT

A associação entre vertigem e dor cervical é queixa frequente no ambulatório de otoneurologia, porém o diagnóstico da vertigem cervical de origem proprioceptiva e seu tratamento são ainda controversos....


Dizziness an cervical pain are complaints that are often associated in the otoneurologic patients, however the diagnosis of cervical proprioceptive dizziness and its treatment are still controversial...


Subject(s)
Neck Pain/rehabilitation , Exercise Therapy , Vertigo/rehabilitation , Physical Therapy Modalities
11.
Rev. bras. otorrinolaringol ; 71(1): 55-59, jan.-fev. 2005. tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-411439

ABSTRACT

A Vertigem Posicional Paroxística Benigna (VPPB) é uma das mais comuns doencas da orelha interna que cursam com tontura, porém o seu tratamento ainda é algo de inúmeras controvérsias. OBJETIVO: Avaliar a influência das orientacões posturais na evolucão precoce de pacientes com diagnóstico de VPPB de canal semicircular posterior, submetidos à manobra de Epley. FORMA DE ESTUDO: Prospectivo randomizado. MATERIAL E MÉTODO: Foram avaliados 50 pacientes com diagnóstico de VPPB de canal semicircular posterior submetidos à manobra de reposicão canalicular de Epley, divididos em Grupo de Estudo - 23 pacientes - que receberam orientacões de restricão postural pós-manobra e Grupo Controle - 27 pacientes - que não receberam orientacões. RESULTADOS: Não houve diferenca estatisticamente significante entre os grupos estudados quanto à resolucão dos sintomas da VPPB independentemente de sexo e idade. CONCLUSAO: A eficácia da Manobra de Reposicão Canalicular de Epley não é influenciada pelo uso ou não das restricões posturais.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Posture , Physical Therapy Modalities/standards , Semicircular Canals/physiopathology , Vertigo/therapy , Age Distribution , Chi-Square Distribution , Dizziness/etiology , Dizziness/physiopathology , Dizziness/therapy , Electronystagmography/methods , Functional Laterality , Head Movements , Prospective Studies , Sex Distribution , Vertigo/complications , Vertigo/physiopathology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL